![ACLU on X: "2003: SCOTUS rules in Grutter v. Bollinger, upholding race-based affirmative action policies in college admissions, reasoning that universities have a compelling interest to cultivate a diverse student body. https://t.co/HwBxll0t24" / ACLU on X: "2003: SCOTUS rules in Grutter v. Bollinger, upholding race-based affirmative action policies in college admissions, reasoning that universities have a compelling interest to cultivate a diverse student body. https://t.co/HwBxll0t24" /](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYW8UEQWkAEoTeZ.jpg)
ACLU on X: "2003: SCOTUS rules in Grutter v. Bollinger, upholding race-based affirmative action policies in college admissions, reasoning that universities have a compelling interest to cultivate a diverse student body. https://t.co/HwBxll0t24" /
![The Supreme Court . The Future of the Court . Landmark Cases . Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) | PBS The Supreme Court . The Future of the Court . Landmark Cases . Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) | PBS](https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/future/images/grutter.jpg)
The Supreme Court . The Future of the Court . Landmark Cases . Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) | PBS
![Grutter v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger The Affirmative Action Debates and Reasons for Their Different Outcomes Presented by Anne-Carmene Almonord and. - ppt download Grutter v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger The Affirmative Action Debates and Reasons for Their Different Outcomes Presented by Anne-Carmene Almonord and. - ppt download](https://images.slideplayer.com/24/7016543/slides/slide_6.jpg)